 | |
List Price: $14.99 | | Label: Code Black Ent
Salesrank: 96543
Released: February 27, 2007 |
| Our Price: $7.93 |
| Used Price: $3.95 |
|
MPAA Rating: Unrated
Media: DVD |
|
Editorial Review:
When night falls upon Las Vegas, the vampires of the underground emerge. Lead vampire "Q" (Alex Wilkinson) is on a quest for the perfect bride with whom he can breed generations of vampires and continue his reign. Meanwhile the Las Vegas police department are in hot pursuit of the culprit behind a series of slayings in the city’s hottest night clubs. The police want to suppress the truth that vampires are taking over his city. If the story hits the news, pandemonium will certainly erupt. The plot thickens when Officer Patterson is found dead, an apparent victim of a bit to the neck. Left to crack the case alone, Officer Johnson sets out It will take one officer to avenge the death of his partner and end "Q" the Head Vampire’s reign of terror.
Vegas Vampires Reviews:
pure schlock! 
2009-11-15 - This is one of those awkward campy movies that are badly made and edited. In other words this is good ole shlock! (this means cheap and trashy) and the horror category has tons of them. And few film categories even have endless beyond low budget micro budget movies that are not even at shlock level. and everyone of them usually are less than bad still... This is like "dracula 3000" from the last five years or so , or 'doctor orlock and the invisible man" from 1970 or 'robot monster" from the 1950's. How can one describe this shlockfest?
The lead vampire is like a saturday night tv horror host. Those guys and gals are great but they are campy on purpose!. Like all shlock movies the film is very innept in spite of having lots of good actors in it. And that only adds to it's shlock-o-meter of bizaareness. Shlock has been around for a long time and many of these movies from the past end up on 'something wierd video" dvd's some are better than this and some are much worse. If you like schlocky cheap horror movies that are awkward then you may enjoy this one.
Agreed 
2009-08-04 - Just read the two below this one. I caught the last 30 minutes on cable waiting for something else to start, and everthing except the bald guy is grade-school amateur stuff.
Vegas Vampire
2009-03-14 - I am not looking to nominate every movie for an academy award (especi-ally sci-fi/horror) . I just like to be entertained. Having said that, this was probably the worst film I have viewed to date. The editing was comical as was the special effects. The public milling about in the background during shootouts and big fight scenes was hysterical. There were actors who's skills ran the gambit from seasoned to what appeared to be first semester acting students. It was like films they would have used for the Mystery Science Theatre. In that format I believe this film would have rated four stars and be a cult favorite. Or watch with the guys while tipping a few etc. and you would probably LOL.
Vegas Vampires
2007-03-19 - My favorite actor in the entire film was Eric Etebari. He plays a perfect bad man and delivered his lines flawlessly and believably.
In my opinion this is a campy poorly written, poorly edited, cliche filled tired vampire movie. There didn't seem to be any continuium although the first scenes promised a better movie. it goes downhill rapidly.
The plot line was thin and the editing made a lot of assumptions that the audience would already know the backstory.
Although some really good actors were in this film, Balwin's part seemed to be an afterthought. More of an addition than a necessary part of the film itself. There seemed to be a lot of overacting or maybe it was just overwriting. Yet in a perfect world, it could turn into a cult film with very little effort.
