Both new and old incarnations of the explosive rock band Guns N' Roses are discussed in this compelling biography. Featuring exclusive interviews with key players on their personal and musical histories and supplemental color photographs, this is a comprehensive look at where the band started, the reasons behind their infamous split in 1994, and what the original members are doing now. This fully revised edition contains information on the highly anticipated Summer 2005 release of Chinese Democracy, Axl's first release in 10 years, as well as details of ex–lead guitarist Slash and ex–bass player Duff's hot new band, Velvet Revolver.
Guns N' Roses: The Band That Time Forgot: The Complete Unauthorised Biography Reviews:
dissappointed 
2009-12-05 - Was disappointed in the content of the book, and did not delve into the band other than that which everyone already knows. Very little interviews with band members. Save your money!
How did this get published? 
2009-03-21 - I can't believe anyone even published this piece of garbage. The book read like the writer simply scribbled down thoughts as they occurred to him, used the wrong words, repeated himself and had a school-boy crush on Axl. It seems like a lot of poorly written filler, but the author never really gets into the genius of Slash - it's all Axl. Clearly this was written by a 7th grader. It pains me to think this retard got paid for this.
Great read 
2008-10-30 - This was truly a good book on Guns N'Roses while it was acurate it didn't throw anybody under the bus and didn't try to make anybody the bad guy. Overall it was a good fun read
Waste of Money 
2008-04-17 - What a horrible book, and this is coming from a HUGE GNR fan. I could go on for pages as to why this book sucks, but I will keep it short. There is no firsthand info from band members, only people who supposedly knew the band. Most of the text of this abortion comes from newspapers and magazines, and the opinion of the author.
It should be called "Why I Love Axl Rose" by Paul Stenning. I don't know who the geniuses are who greenlit this project, but they should be fired.The author is terrible. It reads like a 3rd grade book report. I think I should stop now, as I think I have sufficiently vented my anger over this affront to literature. You would be better served reading the GNR page on Wikipedia.
It was midly interesting 
2007-12-22 - It was okay but I definately don't reccomend anyone to buy it. Its totally inaccurate (At some parts) and it seems to want to focus on Axl a lot of the time more than the band. If you want to read about Guns I'd suggest looking elsewhere.