 | |
List Price: $19.95 | | Label: The Weinstein Company
Salesrank: 6440
Released: July 17, 2007 |
| Our Price: $3.50 |
| Used Price: $3.49 |
|
MPAA Rating: Unrated
Media: DVD |
|
Editorial Review:
(Drama) "Factory Girl" tells the story of the rise and fall of the original "IT GIRL" Edie Sedgwick. When Edie meets famed artist Andy Warhol, she is thrust into a life of glamour, parties and ultimately…tragedy.
Description of Factory Girl (Unrated):
The lovely face of Sienna Miller fills in for luminous but tragic 1960s icon Edie Sedgwick, the child of wealth and privilege who found brief delight but eventual destruction in the fabled Factory of Pop artist Andy Warhol (Guy Pearce). Factory Girl begins with Sedgwick as a naive art student who comes to New York City seeking freedom from her troubled family, just as Warhol was surrounding himself with oddballs, sycophants, and drug addicts. The eager girl briefly becomes Warhol's favorite and the center of the city's attention, but when she falls into an affair with 'The Musician' (the only slightly ambiguous depiction of a certain nasal-voiced rock star, played by Hayden Christensen, Shattered Glass), Warhol is stricken with jealousy. Factory Girl wants to paint Warhol as the villain in this story of innocence corrupted, but the casting undercuts the movie's moral. Miller, though pretty and capable, never takes us under Sedgwick's skin, and Christensen's performance is one-note and clumsy. But Pearce's Warhol fascinates; it's a sneaky, stealthy performance, predatory yet passive, hiding a million neuroses beneath a cunningly vapid facade. Whenever Pearce is on-screen, Factory Girl sparkles; when he's not--despite abundant views of Miller's and Christensen's attractive naked flesh in the "uncut unrated" version--the movie loses its fizz. Also featuring Mena Suvari (American Beauty), Jimmy Fallon (Fever Pitch), and Illeana Douglas (Grace of My Heart). --Bret Fetzer
Factory Girl (Unrated) Reviews:
Discarded muse 
2009-12-01 - I'll admit that I don't really know much about Edie Sedgwick, so I can't speak to the historical accuracy of "Factory Girl". As a dramatic film, I enjoyed it. I thought Sienna Miller's performance was excellent. In fact, "Factory Girl" and "Interview" have both, in my opinion, proved her to be a formidable screen presence. Miller creates a complex character who is both damaged and innocent, and whose natural charisma brings her plenty of attention but is unable to bring her the love and security she desperately needs.
The film, which covers Edie's life from the time she left art school in London to her early death at 28, revolves almost entirely around her relationships with the men in her life. Starting with her horrific, abusive father, all of the men in her life, whether straight or gay, friend or lover, use her to advance their own agendas and then discard her when she's no longer useful. The centerpiece of the film is her relationship with Andy Warhol, which is complex and also seems to mirror her various other traumas ... Warhol represents a combination of the benevolent father figure Edie never had, the gay brother Edie lost to suicide, and her own creative and artistic ambitions.
Edie seems to love Warhol like a puppy loves his owner. Warhol's feelings for Edie are much more complicated. Although he seems to have real affection towards her, he is clearly also drawn to her for completely superficial reasons: her wealth, her looks, and her willingness to let him use her however he wants in his creatives projects. The relationship sours when Edie falls in love with a famous musician who is disgusted by Warhol's world. Like a spurned lover, Warhol turns vengeful and sadistic, and Edie, past her "it girl" prime, self-destructs.
Don't waste your time... 
2009-10-23 - Sienna Miller's portrayal of 60's icon Edie Sedgwick is an embarrassment. She portrays Edie as an empty-headed twit and her affected accent is ridiculous and cloying. While Edie Sedgwick without a doubt had deep emotional problems, she was also incredibly intelligent, well-educated and articulate. To portray her as a naive dip who does nothing but search for love is over-simplication at it's worst. The real Edie was much more complex than that. The film is highly-fictionalized as well, which only adds to it's annoyance factor. Reveiwers who praise the film and/or Miller's performance have no concept of Sedgwick, Warhol or The Factory. This film is a complete and utter waste of time. Additionally, the "real" Edie documentary (also included on this DVD) is nothing but an extended version of the end credits of the film.
Poor little rich "movie" 
2009-09-28 - This film is unfortunate. There is a lot of real talent here, an intriguing story about highly interesting people, and yet it cannot deliver. I think Sienna Miller does a tremendous job as Edie. She is talented and has a striking resemblance. Guy Pearce is no slouch, but his lack of screen time made it difficult to truly understand him, as well as the relationship between Warhol and Edie. Hayden Christensen was kind of a disaster. You knew he was Bob Dylan without being told, but the accent and the mumbling were so contrived...it was the one true flaw of this film. The rest of the cast is a capable talent. And frankly, Jimmy Fallen was just a little too convincing as the parasite of Edie and Warhol.
Yes, the movie was fast paced, but it matched the subject. And you do need knowledge of the time and this "scene," but you can get along without it. The plot was disjointed and seemed to transcend any real timeline, but maybe this was supposed to be a vapid, strikingly superficial look at this story, a mirror of the story itself. Or it could just be a poorly written script and an effort to cram in certain scenes without care for the continuity.
It is a sad film about a sad woman. What this film misses most is complexity, of character and story. If nothing else, it will make you interested in finding out the whole story, which is always a good thing. I recommend watching it, especially if this time, or these people interest you.
Not directed by Oliver Stone; so what? Warhol is great.
2009-09-11 - I think the problem with a lot of people coming to this film for the first time is - it's not fanatical. It's not going to give you a slimy, desperate Andy Warhol like Oliver Stone's. It's gonna give you a realistic impression of who Andy was, and I like it!
Let's face it, in many ways the early 60's were boring. Things weren't happening fast enough, and many young people felt isolated. They were waffling around for something to do, struggling to get more psychologically honest, and Warhol was in his 30's, wanting to create a "happening".
Warhol saw that potential in Edie Sedgwick, only to become acutely aware - she was damaged goods. Guy Pearce as Warhol here gives a stunning portrayal. Sienna Miller is left floating with very little dialog, but makes it work. Maybe that's how the real Edie was - just a young fledging with not a lot of substance, but money... Money that enabled her to do a few things (in spite of the suicides of her brothers and the incest from her father). These are rough topics which have to be handled with subtlety in film.
I thought this story was great! It showed a self-destructive girl reaching out to a man (Andy Warhol) who had an innate understanding of the differences between preservation and destruction. Let's not forget, he was also young. He was probably struggling with how to help her handle her neediness... Such is the case for victims of sexual abuse. He knew, any money given to her would be used for drugs. So, he didn't do it. I like the scenes here where Warhol goes to confession and tries to work out his confusion with the priest.
Warhol was in a bind with this girl... In the same way a landlord would be legally accountable for taking money from drug sales as a rent payment. I don't think he was cruel, I think he was smart. There are hundreds of Edie's on our international streets every day. This one just happened to meet someone who gave her attention without being possessive or controlling. Warhol and Sedgwick were star-crossed; she was able to articulate some things he already knew in his own heart, but repressed. The love was there, but it had no real chance. She needed rescue, and Andy was not an enabler.
I think this film could have really become a 5-star piece had a dynamic actor been chosen to play the role of Bob Dylan; but the chemistry just was not there. I also do not perceive Andy's mother as being a dried-up old hag, so much as a funny kitchen-witch of a character in life. Watch it if you want some better insights into Warhol - Guy Pearce was the super one.
Awful-
2009-07-26 - Awful - awful piece about nutcase (and I mean nutcase) rich girl hanging out with the king of whack - jobs- Andy Warhol. It has NO plot. Just meanders along haphazardly from one vulgar scene to another. P.U. 20 minutes and it went back in the Netflix envelope and returned. Yaawwwnnn.
