 | |
List Price: $29.99 | | Label: MIRAMAX
Salesrank: 15576
Released: February 10, 2009 |
| Our Price: $4.99 |
| Used Price: $1.46 |
|
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Media: DVD |
|
Editorial Review:
A doctor's wife becomes the only person with the ability to see in a town where everyone is struck with a mysterious case of sudden blindness. She feigns illness in order to take care of her husband as her surrounding community breaks down into chaos and disorder. Based on a novel by Nobel Prize winner Jose Saramago.
Description of Blindness:
Based on José Saramago's allegorical novel, Blindness is a haunting film that works like an unusual fusion of fable and gritty suspense. Julianne Moore and Mark Ruffalo star as an unnamed, married couple living in an unidentified city where a mass epidemic of blindness hits. Ruffalo's character, a doctor, is affected, but Moore's is not. When the two are transferred to a government-run quarantine facility complete with armed guards, they soon find themselves in a rapidly deteriorating situation. Criminals take over food distribution and extort possessions and sex from the innocent. Sanitation becomes a thing of the past. More subtly, rules that might govern one's judgement and behavior on an everyday basis simply vanish, and personal and collective values rewrite themselves. Moore's character hides the fact that she can see (except from her spouse), and thus becomes the audience's surrogate in the thick of so much misery. She also becomes an avenging angel at exactly the right time, and then a matriarch when the action shifts from the quarantine hell to the city's streets. The latter part of Blindness finds a handful of the inmates (played by Danny Glover and Alice Braga, among others) joining Moore and Ruffalo in a kind of post-apocalypse oasis, a chapter as touching as the previous chapters were nightmarish.
Director Fernando Meirelles deftly captures the film's spirit of mixed parable and horror, grounding the action but at the same time encouraging a viewer not to take it too literally. He honors Saramago's creative depiction of blindness not as a field of black but, in this case, as an ocean of white. He also does some tricky, disorienting things with the camera, shooting at odd angles, putting his frame around strange details in a scene--all of it has a way of giving a viewer a feeling of what it's like to perceive the world in a whole new way. --Tom Keogh
Blindness Reviews:
Still a little blurry 
2009-11-06 - Pitch black basements covered over with spiderwebs; shadowy, mysterious corners; claustrophobic, foreboding caves; they all work to increase tension in a viewer because the basic sense of sight is the one on which we rely the most. Vision is our crutch. What would happen if we were all suddenly without sight?
An epidemic strikes fear in the populous as blindness spreads like a yawn. Those affected are quarantined into deplorably cramped and filthy conditions, leading to the ugly side of humanity rearing its instinctive head as preservation dominates decency and morality. When Ward 3 begins to assert their dominance over the other groups, forcing the weaker Wards to relinquish cherished valuables and sexual sanctity for the sake of survival (Ward 3 has all the food), it's up to the others - led by the only seeing person in the facility - to fight back and reclaim decency.
Helio San Miguel provides a powerfully allegorical picture of the human nature under the stress of societal implosion. In a brilliantly ironic twist, the resolution of the films displays to both the characters and the viewers how human depravity can sink the majority to subhuman, no, inhumane levels, and even the previously righteous may become wicked. It is only after the realization of our immorality that we are aware, that we can see. The concept itself is wonderfully thought provoking.
The problems with this film, however, are numerous, and most fall into the believability area. Even if this were even remotely possible, there is no way the afflicted would be isolated without medical study. Further, while the odds of infidelity in a completely blind world would definitely increase, the odds of the infidelity coming from a person married to the only woman with sight are remote. Much worse is the idea of a larger group in this sort of situation would allow a few malcontents to turn all others into milquetoast capable of allowing their women to willingly walk into a brutal gang rape.
Overall, I'd say that it's a brave attempt at the seemingly unwinnable endeavor of book-to-film transition. The camerawork - at times iridescent, at others irritating - could easily sway a viewer one way or another. The complete lack of any explanation, specifically the cause of the affliction, the conditions of isolation, and the magical, last-minute cure, hurt the concept's credibility. The result is just a bit fuzzy, but very entertaining.
Overkill
2009-11-04 - This movie poses a very important question:
why do some films get budgets instead of others?
I like a good sci-fi venture or apocalyptic ho-down or 'Lord of the Flies' frolic as much as the next guy, but the mountain of plausibility issues here aren't even worth acknowledging. If this plot worked in the book, great--it certainly doesn't stand on its own. Even more annoying, the film wasted some otherwise decent actors' time. I'm quite certain whoever made this film could have phoned up the sci-fi channel and gotten a list of standby extras that would have been more than sufficient for his or her purposes.
The most remarkable thing about this film is that I can't think of another film off the top of my head where the outtakes footage is probably far more entertaining than the actual film itself.
Awesome movie! 
2009-10-31 - Wow, why does this have such a low rating on IMDB and why does so many people hate it? The only answer that I can come up with is that most of the people that hate it are teens that don't know the meaning of "plot hole". There's no plot hole in this movie. The fact that there's no explanation why people become blind is not a plot hole, it's just not an important detail. Saying that it's plot hole is just like saying that the fact there's no explanation why people become zombies in Dawn Of The Dead is a plot hole. It's not a plot hole, it's just not what the movie is about. It was intentionally not explained. Anyway, it's an awesome movie! It's not only entertaining, it's also sad, disturbing, powerful and I could go on and on and on! I'm pretty sure that it's the only movie that made me go from sad to disturbed to happy and to sad again!
Short review, I know, but I'm just not good at writting reviews. I just hope that it's atleast slightly helpful.
A bit disappointed
2009-10-03 - Let me preface this by saying that I have not read the book.
I was fascinated at the premise of people suddenly going blind although it did bother me that instead of stopping to help, drivers yelled at the poor guy. And why the heck would these people be shuffled off to an old prison intead of hospital? I have a lot more why's but most have already been covered by other reviewers. What annoyed me the most was we never knew why people were going blind, and why Juliane Moore's character did NOT go blind. It was like...HUH?
One would think that the screen writer and whomever else involved, would take into consideration that most people will not have read the book (I didn't even know there was a book) and create a film that made more sense to us.
That said, now that I know there is a book, I'll be picking it up so get a better understanding of the story.
AWFUL 
2009-09-18 - BIG WARNING! There is a very graphic and DISTURBING rape scene in the movie. I strongly suggest that anyone who has had any bad experiences or just has a weak stomach should avoid watching this movie at all costs.
This movie sounds like it would be really cool, but the way they carried it out was just terrible. Maybe if it had taken place in a communist country as opposed to the US or another time period as opposed to the present day, it would have been more believable but that's a BIG maybe. Also, don't expect a satisfying solution at the end because they never explain why the people go blind. This movie didn't provoke thought and was violent, disturbing, and unsatisfying. It left me wanting to slit my wrists after I saw it.
