Stevie Wonder Video:

				Salesrank: 156191
		Used Price: $32.92
		MPAA Rating: R (Restricted) Media: DVD

Editorial Review:
To anyone who truly understands what it means to be an American, Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 should be seen as a triumph of patriotic freedom. Rarely has the First Amendment been exercised with such fervor and forthrightness of purpose: After subjecting himself to charges of factual errors in his gun-lobby exposé Bowling for Columbine, Moore armed himself with a platoon of reputable fact-checkers, an abundance of indisputable film and video footage, and his own ironically comedic sense of righteous indignation, with the singular intention of toppling the war-ravaged administration of President George W. Bush. It's the Bush presidency that Moore, with his provocative array of facts and figures, blames for corporate corruption, senseless death, unnecessary war, and political favoritism toward Osama Bin Laden's family and Saudi oil partners following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Moore's incendiary film earned Palme d'Or honors at Cannes and a predictable legion of detractors, but do yourself a favor: Ignore those who condemn the film without seeing it, and let the facts speak for themselves. By honoring American soldiers and the victims of 9/11 while condemning Bush's rationale for war in Iraq, Fahrenheit 9/11 may actually succeed in turning the tides of history. --Jeff Shannon

Fahrenheit 9/11 [Region 2] Reviews:
Entertaining, but not the best Anti-Bush film
2009-11-29 - There are two types of liberals (or were back then), those who did their research, and those who didn't. I'm undecided about Michael Moore, but I can say that what he's promoting is mostly to be against Bush, and I agree with that. However, I would suggest Greg Palast's film Bush's Family Fortunes: The Best Democracy Money Can Buy as a better film to show, if you want to expose Bush. Greg Palast might not be as entertaining, but he clearly has done more research and interviews both sides. Michael Moore does that as well, but he really tries to push them to look bad. Greg Palast also lets the story tell itself, Michael Moore tries to tell the story.

Creep!
2009-11-23 - Over the course of my many years on this earth, I have voted for more Republican candidates for president than Democrats. In the last four elections, however, my votes went to: Nader (twice), Kerry and then Obama. It's hard for me to imagine that history will not come to judge George W. Bush as our worst president ever.

Be that as it may, I doubt that there have been many worse documentary film makers than Michael Moore. To cite just one example from "Fahrenheit 9/11," there is a short clip where Bush appears to be standing in the midst of a bunch of fat cats, talking about his "base" (i.e., the "haves and have-mores"); this clip was plucked, misleadingly, from a massive fundraising event/dinner put on by the Catholic Church [in which both presidential candidates (Bush and Gore) were in attendance] and at which both were expected to poke fun at themselves for the purpose of giving these donors to Catholic charities something to laugh at. Moore's film cut made it look like Bush was SERIOUSLY pandering to this group. He did this throughout the "Fahrenheit" mockumentary, and I would recommend that you watch the rebuttal-film, "FahrenHYPE 9/11," to see just how extensively Moore's "end justifies the means" philosophy makes an absolute travesty of documentary filmmaking.

"FahrenHYPE" was hastily put together in only four months after Moore's picture came out, and it has its own over-the-top right wing political ax to grind, but it's quite straightforward with its message, and it doesn't use gimmickry and duplicity to push its pro (2004 pre-election) Iraq war agenda. If, however, you can get beyond having to watch some clips of the shrill Ann Coulter, and a few others, the film's real value--amounting to well over half its 80 minute length--consists in pointing out the many spliced, diced, and edited fabrications and distortions (lies, really) that Moore used to go after a president who so sorely lacked the intellectual heft, ecumenical breadth, and diplomatic skill for the job.

Great Documentary
2009-10-11 - This is a Great MM Movie, interesting, well thought out and Exposes some very Interesting things.

What A Waste of time!!!
2009-10-07 - A total waste of time and money. This movie is completely false and unsupported. Just him and his cronies views and no one else. The media, Hollywood and his views and antics are so far left, that as a Firefighter in the NYC area, I'm ashamed to call him a citizen! He should be referred to as Comrade. And now he's going after big business with his new movie. Hummm... I wonder if he'll disclose how much money he has made so far? I guess it's ok to go after capitalism, as long as you don't look at him and his cronies in Hollywood!

You can't have your twinkie and eat it too
2009-10-07 - You can't have your twinkie and eat it too ! Which is it, fat boy ......Did America drop the ball by not being on top of national security or are we unustly persecuting those misunderstood people who only want to express their religious beliefs ? --- As usual, Michael wants it both ways which means it is ALWAYS ONLY Michael's way. Michael only asks and answers the questions he wants to ask and answer and always avoids answering any questions which might threaten his position or asking any questions which does not support his position.
How does Michael accomplish this ? He uses the oldest trick in the book which is to avoid answering a question by answering the question with another question rather than an actual answer. I am a retired Detective who was @ WTC on 9/11 and I was lucky enough to survive unlike the other 3,000 innocent men , women and children who perished on that terrible day. Simply put -- Moore is a fraudulent, hypocritical, flawed director who makes films comprised primarily of fiction and markets them as fact. Moore dishonors all of the people who were lost on 9/11.